Meeting: June 12th, 2017
Supervisor: Menno Van Zaanen
Summary:
- We analyzed the term "objective test", I wrote it:
For R. P. McDonald (2013)“the
test is objective if the items in it do not leave any room for judgment in the
scoring of the responses. Of course, it may be that the original construction
of the test items involved some “subjectivity” of judgment. But it is
objectivity of scoring that marks the objectivity test” (p. 17). He describes nine types of items
responses in an objective test: 1. Completion answers, which is evaluate with
two options (one if the answer is acceptable and zero if the answer any other
reply); 2. Multiple choice items, which show one correct options and other
distractor answers (one if the answer is correct and zero if the answer is
incorrect); 3. Two choice –dichotomous item, which give only two options but
only one correct answer (e.g. True/False); 4. Checklist, which give more than
three options (the better answer of this options); 5. Matching, which associate
objects/concepts/stimuli between two list of options (Amount of the number of
correct matches); 6. Ordered-category, which an integer is given to a category
(e.g. Likert scales); 7. A forced-choice, which has two options to describe
preference (only can chose one); 8. Rankings, which from three or more stimulus
the participant must to choice rank of preference (a number is given to a
category); 9. Unordered category (a values is given to a category).
- However, the subjective tests are more interviews or open writing test. We are abandoning the idea of analyzing the tests with objective and subjective.
- We analized the terms: dipositional and situational attributions.
- I sent your new version literature review at June 9th, 2017. We can make a review to Introduction and Evaluation part.
- I am working on the table with 21st century learning skills (4Cs)

Comentarios
Publicar un comentario